In one way women are making huge progress with their role in the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). The IDF announced in October that the IDF stated. That it was studying possibilities of permitting women as combat officers. In new positions for example, in tanks crews.

The same month, Major Reut (whose name cannot disclosed due to security reasons) became lieutenant colonel. And appointed commanding officer of the Sky Rider battalion. Becoming the second Israeli woman to named the commander of a combat group. Prior to her, there Major Oshrat Bachar who appointed in 2014.

This kind of news could create the impression that the IDF is constantly moving. Even if it is a little slow toward a goal that is definitively gender equality. However, the reality is a lot more complex.

The idea of providing longer combat roles for women has triggered a number of angry responses. The former head of the Ground Forces Command, Major General Yiftah Ron-Tal. Described the plan being scandalous and led by someone wishing to weaken the IDF. Former decorated general and ex-member of the parliament, Avigdor Kahalani. Stated that women’s role is at home and warned that horrors of war might affect women’s capacity to become mothers.

Others came from the sphere of religion. The former IDF head rabbi Israel Weiss stated. We cannot place two soldiers, a male soldier and female soldier in the same container for one week. And assume that nothing happens. You’ll be getting a tank soldier after 9 months.

A Controversial Rabbi Defense

In addition To make matters worse, simultaneously IDF officials IDF announced. The elevation to Rabbi Col. Eyal Karim into the post of chief rabbi. This is the most important religious position within the IDF. This announcement met with protests from feminist and human rights groups due to Karim’s controversial past statements.

Karim quoted in 2012 that rape during wartime could justified, if there consideration for the soldiers’ difficulties while fighting. Karim also stated that it entirely forbidden for women to join the army to protect their modesty. He also has argued against women singing in army functions.

The Israeli High Court of Justice, in response to a petition filed through Meretz (a left-wing political party) has delayed the appointment of Karim by requesting an affidavit that clarifies his remarks from the past. The petition eventually withdrawn, after Karim published a letter of clarification which reads:

I’ve made a mistake Sometimes I didn’t phrase my comments exactly and there have people who have been affected because of my comments I would like to sincerely apologize.

The President of Israel’s Supreme Court, Justice Miriam Naor who ruled in favor of Karim’s nomination, noted. It is a shame that the clear words of the respondent in his affidavit did not receive expression earlier but better late than never.

Conscription And Women, As Well As Conscription

It believed that the IDF the very first military worldwide to institute compulsory military service for females and males. Conscription established by the Israeli Defense Service Law of 1949, which expresses the view by Israel’s IDF to the army of the people.

Although debates on where women are able to serve in the military common, Israel always taken pleasure in the function women have given in military organizations, involuntarily, long before the founding in the nation of Israel.

Being a part of the IDF typically regarded not only an obligation under the law, but also, and possibly primarily as a social norm. It a largely accepted, honorable rite of passage within Israeli society. Even though this consensus has weakened over the past decade however, the public debates on the nature of women’s roles within the IDF don’t challenge in the general public discourse, the fundamental concept of women’s conscription.

Zones Reserved For Men Defense

As the debate continues to rage over the role women supposed to take on in the army Another important event looming over the scene. In 2000 amending the Military Service Law determined that women entitled to take on any role in the military.

As per the law, women may barred from a specific job in the military only if that exclusion required by the particular nature of the position. However, religious requirements for the creation of a non-women military environment can result in the exclusion of women from specific military tracks and positions, even if such exclusion not necessary due to what required of the work.

The fear heightened due to an order by the chief of general staff Gadi Eisenkot, which granted believers the option to refrain from carrying out military work with women.

Integration Order Defense

It was an revision to the order of 2003, known as appropriate integration order, that guaranteed the rights of soldiers who are religious to an environment in the army which is in harmony with their religious beliefs and, in particular, the need to keep away from females under circumstances of seclusion or immodesty.

In addition, the fact that the Israeli government as well as the IDF remain committed to continuous efforts to improve the participation in the army of Haredi (Jewish Ultra Orthodox) men in the army, makes matters more complicated further. The prerequisite for this participation is more often than not a male-only unit.

To increase the number of youth who are religious in their participation in the army and enlistment. The IDF has created the concept of a female-free. Defined area for males who are religious throughout the whole process of recruiting and signing up. As a result of requests from Haredi leaders, a brand new military camp will constructed. For the soldiers with a strict interpretation of Jewish rules will adhered. To and that includes the complete omission of females.

The latest disagreement among Turkish Presidency Recip Tayepp Erdogan and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. Concerning Rutte’s refusing to permit Turkish ministers to travel abroad for campaigning and campaign abroad. Made the situation more difficult for Turks living in the Netherlands.

People with an ethnic Turkish heritage within the Netherlands pressured. To choose sides in a tense diplomatic battle that they left with nothing to gain and nothing to lose. Erdogan utilizes the issue to make his case stronger prior to a referendum. In order to expand his powers and Dutch officials use to demonstrate. To voters how hard they will go against immigrants who refuse to integrated.

The one who benefited the most is Geert Wilders. Who is the most well-known figure in Dutch political circles right now.

Wilders has had a massive impact on Dutch politics. His anti-immigrant, Anti-Islam rhetoric has completely altered the Dutch debate on integration. Due to Wilders the mainstream parties have moved to the right. Regarding the issue of immigration Islam as well as integration.

This implies that Dutch people with immigrants’ backgrounds, particularly Muslims are becoming smaller in the number of secular liberal parties like those of the Social Democrats and the Greens that have historically received the highest support from immigrant voters.

An Open System Of Minorities’ Representation

About 20 percent in the Dutch population comes from immigrants of the first or second generation background. Around 22%, or around two million, are of an non-Western background. This group is the principal subject for Wilders as well as the Freedom Party.

The Dutch system of proportionality generally favors minority representation with regard to gender, ethnicity and background. The elections in the Netherlands utilize the party list system that has pure proportionality, extremely low thresholds, and the capacity to cast votes with preference.

Parties list their candidates in elections. The order of the candidates is set by each party but voters can choose one of the candidates listed, who will independently be able to gain a seat if receiving enough votes. Parties need only 60,000 votes (in the country of nearly 17 million) to secure one of the 150 seats of parliament. Dutch parliament.

Because of the openness of the political system as a result of this open political system, the proportion of politicians from immigrants within the Dutch parliament is one of the highest in Europe.

DeNK’s Initial Birth DENK Dutch

The mainstream parties have shifted further to the left to protect themselves from Wilders The politicians as well as their constituents have become increasingly angry.

Two politicians from Turkish descent, Tunahankuzu and Selcuk Ozturk both have strong connections to the conservative religious section of the Turkish-Dutch community They have left their party Social Democratic Party after intense internal battles over the degree to the extent that Turkish religious organizations can hinder integration and must closely investigated and possibly banned. Kuzu and Ozturk founded an independent party called DENK which translates to think in Dutch and equality in Turkish.

Our research indicates that the support for secular progressive parties in the immigrant community has declined rapidly. Their trust and enthusiasm for Dutch political life has also decreased and has affected participation rates in a significant way.

The studies of teenagers from immigrants show that a growing percentage of this population does not connect with Dutch society or politics anymore. Irritated and shaming and feels that their needs represented by major political parties.

Turkish-Dutch Conservative

DENK expected to secure two seats in the parliament. Given that the Turkish-Dutch conservative community is quite large organized, well-organized and active politically, that might not seem to unreasonable.

However, whether this signal the beginning of the process of emancipation for those. With a background of immigrants and if DENK can effectively represent their interests remains to seen https://rtppokerv.com/.

The main theme of the DENK party’s programmer includes connection. Their campaign approach so far has been to attack .Their political adversaries with aplomb (especially when they are from a different country) together with Wilders supporters and the media.

In the short run this tactic might satisfy their members desire to express anger and discontent. However, in the long run it will only cause polarization and perhaps even segregation. Two things that are definitely not beneficial to the group.

Future Of Dutch Integration

People who are immigrants must both believe that it’s still important to be fighting for something. And receive some form of trust from and an understanding of their homeland, as our research shows.

The political debates of the moment tend to examine whether immigrants are adapting in Dutch culture. This method portrays a connection to the country of origin as a major issue. That leaves no space for dual identity. This will only result in more division and polarization rather than creating a democratic discussion. That allows everyone to be a part of the discussion.

Who will be the first to take the initiative to bridge the Netherlands various parties and constituents? The longer we put off the longer it will become.

Private information isn’t the social standard, as stated by Facebook the founder Mark Zuckerberg in 2010. As social media made the leap of bringing more personal information to the public domain.

What does it mean for the citizens, governments and the practice of democracy? Donald Trump is clearly not the only leader to utilize his Twitter account. To announce his policies and influence political environment. Social media poses new opportunities for strategic decision-making and has now become a managerial problem for many government officials.

It also provides the public with a platform that is free for involvement in government. Many argue that the development of social media technology. Gives citizens and others an opportunity to spot the flaws of government and their political machinations.

The government is embracing the power in social media, and the impact of feedback positive or negative on the success. Of their program and their projects, they also use this tool to benefit by spreading fake information. The freedom of expression and personal opinion could a double edged sword.

A Tool That Initiates Social Changes

Positively the positive side is that social media includes social networking apps like Facebook as well as Google+, microblogging services like Twitter blogs, videos, blogs (vlogs) and wikis and media sharing sites like YouTube and Flickr as well as Flickr and YouTube, in addition to many others.

Social media, as a collaborative and participative instrument, connects users to one another and assists in to shape communities. It plays a crucial role in providing public service value for citizens, it also allows individuals to participate in the process of making policy and politics more effective and makes the process easier to comprehend through the use of information and communication technology (ICTs).

Today, four out of five nations in the world offer social media functions on their portals that facilitate interactive communication and interaction with citizens. Even though we don’t have data on the efficacy of these tools or whether they utilized to their fullest potential 20 percent of these countries show how they’ve resulted in new policy decisions, regulation or service.

Policies Of Social Government

Social media is an effective method to bring about modifications in the policies of government and services when properly used. It is a great tool to combat corruption because it’s a direct way of contacting people. In the developing world corruption often tied to government services that not the ability to automatize processes or provide transparency in the payment process.

The UK is leading the way in this area. The anti-corruption innovation hub designed to bring together different stakeholders such as civil society and law enforcement, as well as technology experts in order to coordinate their efforts towards an improved transparency in society.

Social media has allowed governments can enhance and alter how they interact with their citizens. They may even challenge government plans and policies. In Kazakhstan as an example an amendment to the law governing migration came into effect in January 2017 and required homeowners to sign up the people living in their residences immediately or face a fine fee that began on February 1, 2017.

The public not prepared for this change, and many reacted with anger through social media. Initially, the government resisted the reaction. But as the outrage grew on social media the government intervened and launched a new service to make it easier for people to register as temporary citizens.

Politics Shaping

Digital services that are increasingly accessible have enthused and enthused the people to be more politically and socially engaged. Many government officials are wary of the influence technology, particularly smart media, has over the political participation of citizens.

The most popular social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp restricted by a variety of governments. China, South Africa and other countries are enacting laws to regulate the sphere of social media.

The influence of social media allows users to gain access to government data facts whose credibility not always confirmed. When this happens the natural image created by their minds affected and altered and a new image, either positive or negative it will formed.

For instance, the most trends on social media today are based on tweets from Wikileaks. Which claims that CIA could access the world of smart devices, such as phones and Samsung TVs to monitor people. The series of revelations caused Wikileaks the founder Julian Assange have his internet service cut off. According to the Ecuadorian government Ecuador in the month of October.

For his supporters, this action could undermine what they believe to be the truth’s voice. WikiLeaks generally release masses of accurate and sensitive information to the public regarding society, politics and the economy.

Private Social Information

Some say that private information should not posted on social media as it could risk life and incorrectly read. In 2011 social media played an important part in the direction. The Arab springs across Egypt, Tunisia and Libya as it allowed. Protesters in these countries to share their experiences and reveal the atrocities perpetrated by their respective government. This led to the domino effect that led to massive uprisings.

Governments responded by attempting to restrict the use of social media. Ranging from blocking to the promotion of fake news and anti-social propaganda.

The spread of uncensored content via social media has triggered an influx of public displays of discontent. Characterized by a mixture of demands for improved public services. Changes to institutions, and the establishment of an officially-legitimated social state. People use social media to connect with other groups. many of these interactions can lead to actions.